Writing

Is it Weird or is it Wrong?*

"Is it weird or is it wrong" was my process for the SAT Writing Section (pre-Erica).

Here's how I scored in 2011, "by ear," as an adult:

It is worth noting that:

  1. I do not recall ever being taught grammar in school.
  2. I do remember being told by an English teacher that a comma happens when you feel a pause. I believed that was "the official comma rule" for about 35 years.
  3. I worked in book publishing for over two decades and am a voracious reader.

Point #1 is probably a universal truth for American-educated kids facing the SAT today, as is some variation of point #2.

According to Erica:

Most of my students had little to no familiarity with grammatical terminology, so rather than simply reviewing concepts and offering up a couple of tricks, I had to teach them virtually all of the fundamentals of grammar.

Point #3 probably makes me anomalous (have I mentioned that I just bought my first pair of reading glasses?).

Given that the average SAT Writing score is 492, I can not think of one single reason why every student facing the SAT should not own their own copy of The Ultimate Guide to SAT Grammar.  This is THE definitive guide to the SAT Writing section (and trust me, I've examined most others).

Erica is the most precise human being I have ever met with regard to SAT grammar.  I have visions of her picking through single words in the Blue Book as if individual blades of grass. To give you some idea:

Furthermore, I noticed that specific kinds of questions always showed up at specific points in the test. For example:

-Faulty comparisons almost always showed up in the last three Error-Identification questions, as did certain kinds of tricky subject-verb agreement questions.

-The final Fixing Sentences question (#11 in the first Writing section, #14 in the second) very frequently dealt with parallel structure.

Are you starting to get the picture?  

When I first started picking apart exams and grouping their questions by category, I did not quite understand why the College Board chose to focus so heavily on certain types of errors (subject-verb agreement, pronoun agreement, parallel structure) and virtually ignore others. Contrary to what most guides say, “who vs. whom” is not actually tested on the SAT, even though who, and very occasionally whom, are underlined on various questions. Then, as a tutor, I read the writing of high school students – lots of them. And I started to notice that most of their writing was full of the exact errors tested on the SAT. Here it seems that the College Board does actually know what it’s doing.

 

More to come from me about this book, but for now, I'll leave it at this:  if you are facing the SAT, you must own this book.

 

*From the Introduction to The Ultimate Guide to SAT Grammar.

llustrations by Jennifer Orkin Lewis

Full disclosure:  I scoured the book about 10 times for missing punctuation and spacing errors in the 11th hour, in exchange for tutoring time with Erica. It was a labor of love and I'd do it again in a heartbeat.


 
  • http://costofcollege.wordpress.com/ Grace

    "... I had to teach them virtually all of the fundamentals of grammar."

    I might have mentioned this here already, but in high school junior honors English class at our local high school, the teacher spent the first several weeks of the school year reviewing (or, I should I say, "teaching") the fundamentals of grammar.  Meanwhile, the high school principal tells parents that in order to get the highest SAT scores, prep courses are needed.  Duh!

    • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

      Wow.  I haven't heard that too often (teaching of grammar).  That's actually my third good impression of your school district.

      The first was your former vice principal who became our middle school principal:  David Sottile.  Love him.  Very impressive.  Smart, hard worker, does the right thing.  Not afraid to take a risk.  Unusual. 

      And your high school trig log calc. teacher who became my son's 11th hour 10th grade math tutor.  Again, smart, hard working, upbeat.

      From the outside looking in, seems like your school district is more evolved than most.

    • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

      Wow.  I haven't heard that too often (teaching of grammar).  That's actually my third good impression of your school district.

      The first was your former vice principal who became our middle school principal:  David Sottile.  Love him.  Very impressive.  Smart, hard worker, does the right thing.  Not afraid to take a risk.  Unusual. 

      And your high school trig log calc. teacher who became my son's 11th hour 10th grade math tutor.  Again, smart, hard working, upbeat.

      From the outside looking in, seems like your school district is more evolved than most.

      • http://costofcollege.wordpress.com/ Grace

        Ack!  I wasn't as clear as I should have been.  To me, the fact that high school honors English students had to spend several weeks studying grammar fundamentals indicated that they were not taught this adequately in the previous grades, when they should have been.

        • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

          Right....got it.  I actually did sort of get that, but I was thinking to myself, well, better late than never (because I've seen never!).

  • Elise

    I was told the same rule about commas - when you "feel" like you need to pause add a comma.  Ha ha! 

    Nowadays I am wondering why they insist on teaching kids the five paragraph essay form.  In my opinion, people generally don't stick to those rules in real life.  Maybe in a loose kind of way but not as exact as some teachers want to follow it.  Many (NOT ALL) teachers want them to follow rules and they forget to teach the kids how to write something that a person will be interested in reading.  As long as they follow all the rules they get a good grade.  I think I have done the most in helping my son understand the concept that he has to imagine how interesting it is to a reader.  I've told him that he should think about that ABOVE following specific rules.  Gasp!  Well, I guess that wouldn't help him get a better grade on the SAT but I think it's more important to think about the rest of his life.  I guess that's easy to say now that he has gotten into the college of his choice.  Smile.

    • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

      I've had an epiphany about the Essay: I'm going with one example and building it out in detail.  Whenever I use 2 or 3 examples I end up with a whole lot of nothing.

      Re following the rules: I'm reading the book Choke right now and I got to this part where she's talking about why boys do better on the SAT than girls do, and she said one of the reasons is that boys are comfortable breaking the rules, and girls aren't.  The girls are doing the full algebraic equation, and the boys are back solving and plugging in.

      I believe there's probably a lot of truth to that.  In fact, the whole book is fascinating to me.  More to come on it.

      • Elise

        That's very interesting about following the rules, however, my son is a rule follower and it may be why he got a 7 and then a 6 on the SAT essay.  As I said, I spent a lot of this past year trying to get him to NOT follow the rules so closely when he was writing.  The SAT was over but he needed to do a lot of writing for college applications and scholarships.  I told him not to spend time looking on the internet at how he was supposed to write something like a personal statement/essay and instead try to write thinking about a person reading it and being interested in him.  He wrote things that were different enough to stand out but not so weird to turn people off.  I also helped him on his speech for graduation and he didn't look to the internet examples at all for help.  Many people commented that it was very good...different than the usual but good.  I think writing interesting things may always be a challenge for him because what he finds interesting is so different than the average person.  For example, his final English paper was titled "ISAAC NEWTON VERSUS GOTTFRIED LEIBNIZ: WHO DESERVES CREDIT FOR THE INVENTION OF CALCULUS."  Nine glorious pages. Hee hee.

      • http://costofcollege.wordpress.com/ Grace

        I do not oppose all rule-breaking (sometimes it's glorious!), but here's what I think.  It's much better if you know the rules before you break them.

        • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

          I completely agree.

          I believe that was the point the author was making (i.e. that both genders knew the rules, but only the boys were would break them to score higher).

        • Satverbaltutor

          That is EXACTLY what I wrote in the introduction to my book (the part that Debbie didn't cite)! Rule-breaking is totally fine as long as you do it for a good reason. If you're just messing up because you can't be bothered to learn the rules, though, that's just lazy. 

          Mastery of rules vs. creativity is not some sort of irreconcilable paradox -- the former gives you the freedom to be the latter. Creativity that doesn't exist in any sort of framework often just ends up being a mess. Knowing the rules allows you to play with them, to push them, to interpret them, etc. It gives you control over your writing. 

  • http://kitchentablemath.blogspot.com/ Catherine

    We started using Erica's book this weekend!

    • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

      Excellent, right?

  • http://www.traceyjacksononline.com/ Tracey Jackson

    I always thought the same thing. Don't remember being taught - though I might have been napping and I always thought it came with the imagined pause.

    • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

      You, napping?  no way!

  • Satverbaltutor

    Debbie, thanks for the plug, you're beyond fabulous;) 

    As the resident grammar pedant/party pooper, however, I feel obligated to point out that you do not need a comma in the following sentence: "I worked in book publishing for over two decades, and am a voracious reader." Care to look in my book and explain to me why? 

    Love,
    Erica 

    • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

      I want to keep you in my back pocket at all times, just in case.....

      Well, let me see, here's my process:

      It's not a comma splice because a comma + a FANBOY (in this case, "and")  would fix that.

      Am I missing a subject in that second half?  Is that my problem?  If I change "am" to "I'm" would that fix it?

      ohhhhh, I found it:  "Do not use a comma if the subject is not repeated in the second clause."  (Is that it?)

      I feel like I'm cheating if I change it before knowing exactly why, but why embarrass myself for any longer than necessary.  Changing now.  Please confirm I got the reason right ;)

      And thank you for helping to improve me!

      • Satverbaltutor

        Yes, that's the right reason;) Now I bet you won't forget it! But don't worry about embarrassing yourself -- I'm probably the only person who would ever notice that and/or care (actually I don't really care so much about that rule in real life, it just seemed like something I should point out given the topic of your post...) 

        • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

          You have no idea how appreciative I am to have my grammatical errors pointed out to me.  In fact (and I'm not kidding about this), I would never scored as well as I did on the writing section had I not had a mother who always corrected me (and I'm so grateful that she did). 

          • Satverbaltutor

            Ok, well since you said that, the idiomatic phrase is "appreciative of having," not "appreciative to have" (gerund vs. infinitive). That would have actually been a really good one to include in my gerund vs. infinitive list. Too late now...

          • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

            Keep it coming!
            Next edition we shall add.

  • Jen

    Just clicked over and read your review of the book on Amazon too.  This detail stood out, "So in other words, if you need to find a bunch of dangling modifier
    questions to practice on, flip to the back of this book and you'll find
    them cross referenced by page and test/problem number.
    "  Wow!  That's surely a lot easier than scanning pages looking for them!

    Do you know of any books that do the same for math?  Some are easy enough to find (say geometry problems), but I'd buy a book just on the basis of this sort of indexing alone!

    • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

      I can't believe I forgot to include that MAJOR VALUE ADD DETAIL in this post.  I have a few posts tk about this book -- so I will be sure to include in future, because I agree -- it's a unique and valuable feature.

      I don't know of anyone who has done it in a book for the math, unfortunately.  

    • Anonymous

      Hi Jen - 
      The Ultimate SAT Tutorial by Erik Klass sort of does this.  It lists problems by type - Basic Algebra, Algebra, Geometry, Functions, Probability and etc.  Not to the level of detail that Erika does.  

      I'm an SAT tutor and I've got all that info broken out for my students. I'd be happy to send you a list.

    • Bing

      Here's one source based off of their SAT Math Bible: http://powerscore.com/satmathbible/content_bluebook.cfm

      • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

        cool.  Have you tried it?

        • Bing

          The SAT Math Bible is probably the best SAT Math-only book I've come across so far, but there's room for improvement (despite being 400+ pages long!). I like the Ultimate SAT Tutorial mentioned by Stacey for clearer explanations of certain things like permutations/combinations and direct/inverse variation. The Powerscore blue book database is a great resource though. I think using the SAT Math Bible in parallel with the Ultimate SAT Tutorial (& Ultimate SAT Supplement for blue book explanations) would be a comprehensive way to self-study. It takes a long time though!

          • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

            Thanks.  I actually have that Ultimate SAT Tutorial book and think I will break it out this morning now that you've reminded me of it.

            I have often been frustrated by the Klass explanations because they'll sometimes say "use a calculator," as the explanation.  That's it!  (and by the way, sometimes I don't know how to do the calculation on the calculator.

            I'm like, wait, what if I don't want to use a calculator.  HOW DO I DO THE PROBLEM?!

            But, I'm been struggling with functions (not the easy ones, but those tricky nestled double function ones) -- and I've broken out at least a half a dozen books to find some way to make it stick beyond a few minutes -- to no avail.  

            Trying Ultimate SAT book this morning.  After my morning Kumon (it's like taking a little jog in the morning).

  • Pingback: Ooops. I Forgot to Mention the Best Part | Perfect Score Project