Test Day

“Fair Test” Procedures for SAT Day

 

After my terrible SAT experience last Saturday, I decided to look into whether or not any official rules had been broken.

Turns out there is an official SAT rule guide, The SAT Standard Testing Room Manual, which I think is worth reading before you take an SAT (especially Section A, which is only 11 pages long).

From the first paragraph:

"The SAT Program has established policies and procedures to ensure that all students can test under a uniform set of conditions .... All students are to be protected from disturbance. By strictly following our policies and procedures, you give students the best guarantee of fair testing."

Personally, I felt intimidated to say something to the proctor because I wasn't sure if official "rules" were broken, or whether they were "courtesies" he was forgoing.

And if I had trouble speaking up (i.e. a grown up who's not usually afraid to speak her mind), I imagine it would be even more difficult for a teenager to muster the courage -- especially if he or she isn't even sure about the official rules.

I did speak to the proctor at the first break and told him that lopping off five minutes of our time mid-way through a Reading Section really threw me -- and he responded by saying, "it was the lesser of two evils," which did not leave me inclined to speak up again, when the noise disturbances from other kids who had finished the test in the same gym became so loud that they echoed for our last 4 sections.

Turns out this proctor was wrong.  It was not "the lesser of two evils" to cut off five minutes of our time, mid-section.   In fact there there is an official rule in the manual for this exact situation: "Overtiming: Make no adjustment."

That was just the beginning of the broken rules last Saturday.....

1) The "Visible Clock" Rule:

I have experienced this "visible clock" issue a few times over the course of the 6 SATs I've taken this year (5 different locations). But, "lack of visibility" last Saturday was the least of my problems.

Start with the fact that the proctor inexplicably wrote the time down in the middle of the the Essay Section (after telling us before we started that he had no chalk to do so) -- but he didn't write it in our time zone time -- because, as he later explained to me when I asked, the (non-visible) clock turned out not to be in our time zone.

Fine, except that it confused me to see "a time" (but not our time) suddenly appear on the blackboard without explanation.

Also, there were no "regular" time warnings, as mentioned above in the manual -- I'd say they were more sporadic in nature (i.e. "2 minutes," or nothing at all....)

2) Desk Size (Avoid having a "deskette" experience):

To be fair, my deskette last Saturday probably did meet this "official standard" -- but I'm going to tell you now, that's too small for an optimal SAT experience.  12" by 15" holds ONE 8 x 11 test booklet  -- except that there are TWO booklets that need holding when you take the SAT (plus your calculator for math sections, and pencils).

Lack of proper desk space adds a juggle variable to the SAT experience that is distracting, time consuming, stressful, and noisy.  Try to find an SAT location with full desks (i.e. ask your friends).

3) Adult Test Takers:

I've experienced "assigned seating" once out of 6 SATs, and the fact of the matter is that I was assigned the front and center seat.  Not sure if that was a coincidence.

 

4) Timing and Breaks:

I believe this rule was carefully followed at every other SAT that I took this year, which is how I ended up lulled into complacency last Saturday.  I had grown to expect this rule to be followed, and when it wasn't (starting in Section 3), I was thrown for such a loop I had trouble recovering.  Or maybe I was thrown off when the time mysteriously appeared on the board in a different time zone.  I don't know.  Either way, this "Timing Policy" wasn't followed, and it messed with me.

 

5) Reporting Irregularities:

I have no idea whether or not our proctor reported the "timing irregularities" that day.

 

6) Student Complaints: 

Ok, I'm not "a student," but I did have many of these same complaints.

I could continue on with these screen shots of broken rules from last weekend, but instead I'll just reiterate that any SAT test taker should read pages 1-11 of  The SAT Standard Testing Room Manual before test day.

And speak up if a rule is broken!

UPDATED: Test Prep Coach left interesting comment well worth reading, including this link from the New York Times about the SAT test conditions.

 

Illustrations by Jennifer Orkin Lewis

 
  • http://twitter.com/SheldonWordNerd Sheldon the WordNerd

    This is GREAT Debbie!  I think kids/parents/pros don't know this stuff, and they should.

    • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

      Thanks.  Agreed.  I know I wish I'd known the rules "in the moment" and will make sure my kids know.

      Gotta know your rights!

      • http://tutorsfortestrprep.com Elizabeth King

        This is really great. I'll link to this from my site. I was only put front-and-center a single time--and actually shushed the proctors who were whispering in the front of the room during a timed section.

        • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

          Thanks....I've heard the most insane stories (way worse than mine) since I posted my story last Saturday.

  • http://blog.pwnthesat.com PWN the SAT

    Love this post. You took a bad experience, and turned into fantastic advice. 

    • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

      Thank you...that's my specialty (lemons to lemonade). 
      But don't anyone expect me to share my scores on this one....Unless there was some act of god that occurred and I did better than I felt like I did.  But I don't think so.You've got to know your SAT rights!

  • Cookie Lady

    My son had several similar problems with his first SAT test experience.  The only good news was the 150 point rise in scores when he re-took under better conditions this fall.  But the impact is real.

    • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

      Agreed.  The impact was REAL for me too! I'm telling you, I was having a panic attack because of those conditions.

      Glad to hear your son did better when conditions improved.  Did you look into the better conditions before you signed him up for another?

      • Cookie Lady

        No, I did go and read the proctoring manual - just as you did, and I wrote the principal with a complaint.  He retook the test this fall at a different school.  This time he wore his own watch so that he would not have to worry about a proctor who did not announce time until the end or the fact that he was sitting in a seat where he could not see a clock.  He controlled all the things he could control, and I think that's as far as you can go.

        • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

          Right....though of course I'm hoping to go a little further for my son.  I want him to have a full desk.  That made a big difference to me.  Plus, he's a lefty and those deskettes are usually for righties....so that's an extra element.

          I wrote to the school and asked; never heard back.  But I do think my son will speak up re all of these issues now that he's thinking about it. 

  • Pingback: Know Your SAT Rights |

  • TestPrepCoach

    Ask any test
    prep tutor or any kid how much the test conditions (especially timing) matter
    on this test -- it is right up there with knowing the material. The erratic
    manner in which time is monitored on this so-called standardized test is enough
    to throw its whole reliability into question.

    How can you
    call it a standardized test when the timing is anything but?

     

    I tutor
    students for these tests and I *regularly* hear horror stories about all kinds
    of poor proctors (see the following links for two rare pieces that the media
    covered). But given how high-stakes test scores have become, the lack of
    quality control regarding time in
    particular is practically criminal. When every second and point counts, many
    proctors 'guesstimate' the time using those ubiquitous yet unreliable analog
    clocks or make other significant mistakes. Yet the problem continues while the
    stakes for high scores continue to rise.

    I predict that the College Board, in addition to denying the severity and impact of the problem, would
    probably say it would have to double its fee to provide a fully-trained and
    reliable team of proctors and large digital clocks for every classroom.

    But there's
    something *really* wrong here! We can't just shrug it off as a pesky but
    benign situation. Let's remember there is so much riding on the test -- yet the
    manner of its administration is faulty and the College Board has not been taken
    to task. I smell a class-action lawsuit...In a field as widespread and influential
    as testing/preparation is, poor test conditions and poor proctoring are the
    elephants in the room that no one talks much about....me included.

    I appreciate
    your copying the SAT Standards, Debbie, so I can tell my students about them. That's
    where we can start, anyway -- empowering the test-takers.

     

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/01/education/edlife/01proctor-t.html

    http://thechoice.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/12/cheat-stuy/

     

    P.S. Maybe
    we could develop a "secret-shopper" group to spy on test
    administrations nationwide...

    • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

      Thanks for your great comment. Since I posted that video right after the awful test, I've been inundated with with stories that have shocked me -- stories much worse than my own experience.

      I guess the thing to do is make sure all students know their rights and speak up when they are not being met.  The problem is that then you could potentially open up investigation and have to take the test again -- and I'd imagine most people wouldn't want to do that.

      I'm hoping though shining a light on this type of thing will a) make the College Board enforce the rules for the sake of the testers, b) give students the info they need to feel empowered to speak up, and c) share information about test locations (desks, proctors, details).  

      In fact, I think I'm going to start that on my site. (i.e. Feedback about locations)

      Stay tuned.  Thanks

    • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

      Just read those links.  Thanks for passing along.  Will post them everywhere.

  • Claire

    You'll get the 2400! I see you lack in math... Buy "Dr. Chungs SAT Math." It is a dream, and unlike other books. Worth the $$.
    Please look into it! xo A high schooler in Orlando, FL. 2370

    • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

      Thanks for reminding me about Dr. Chung.  He scared me off a few months ago (I think I gout 5/20 right), but I should try again.

      My son (who is much better at math than I am) says "it's not hard."  We shall see.  

      Thanks for reminding me.

      AND THANKS FOR THE SUPPORT!!!!

  • Jack W Perry

    This is very interesting. I think it time to turn the focus on the SAT and College Board. They need to be regulated and held accountable. A good chapter for your book.

    Keep up the good fight!

    • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

      Thanks Jack. I'm an extra sensitive soul (very affected by light and sound) -- so I assumed that I was probably more bothered than the other students by all the issues from that Nov. test (especially given that no one else appeared bothered by it), but since I posted the video, and then this post about the rules, I've gotten a TON of email from people with stories that are much worse than my own.

      So it's definitely an issue that needs addressing...and will definitely make it in the book.  The stakes are just too high to ignore the issue.

      I have one more SAT to go (Dec. 5) and I guess need to figure out what I'll do if "rules are broken" (now that I know them).

      • Jack W Perry

        You are uniquely qualified to report on this. Most taking the test are 17-18 year olds who just want to get into college. You are looking at it with a much more critical eye. You may be a sensitive soul, but you also are not afraid to speak your mind. I can see this 'basic rights of an SAT taker' as a good hook. P,us the entire book sounds fascinating.

        • http://www.perfectscoreproject.com Debbie Stier

          Agreed!  C H A P T E R!!

  • Pingback: November SAT Scores Are Back (learn from my experience!) | Perfect Score Project

  • Pingback: Slowly But Surely, Filling Up the Site with SAT Tips and Resources | Perfect Score Project

  • Pingback: Avoiding “The Porkchop” — And Other Things You May Not Have Thought Of | Perfect Score Project

  • Pingback: For The Record….. | Perfect Score Project

  • anywho

    You know what, the 'SAT encouraging students to report problems' thing is totally hypocritical. They prevent students from reporting any problem by informing them that their scores might be delayed due to that complaint, because they need to "investigate". Who wants to take that risk especially if the test date is in the end of the year and students actually have started the applications and are waiting eagerly for their scores. So this lack of practical ways of problem reporting results in the continuous decrease in test center quality. In some of the international test centers, the test administrators actually chatted with each other in the back of the test room while students were still taking the test. If the SAT really care about students, they would start a better way for students to report their test day problems without worrying about interfereing their rights.